/Oh My God… The Garuda Indonesia Trouble By no means Finishes, Now Sued for IDR 4.4 Billion!

Oh My God… The Garuda Indonesia Trouble By no means Finishes, Now Sued for IDR 4.4 Billion!

PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk was sued by PT Prima Raya Solusindo (plaintiff) to fork out compensation in the variety of material losses of Rp.2,962,553,000 and immaterial losses of Rp.1,500,000,000.

In addition to Garuda as defendant I, PT Prima Raya Solusindo also includes PT Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk as co-defendant I and PT Asuransi Kredit Indonesia (Persero) Tbk as co-defendant II.

Also examine: Haris Azhar’s speech this time is sharper than a razor blade: I’m a far better ruler than a felony…

Quoted from the official internet site of the Central Jakarta District Court, Monday, November 22, 2021, the plaintiff in his lawsuit questioned the court to grant the plaintiff’s provision request in its entirety, stating that the defendant has not been authorized to file a declare and disburse the plaintiff’s bank warranty.

“Purchased the Defendant and the Plaintiff to to start with conduct an investigative audit in analyzing the price of the decline suffered by the Defendant,” wrote the plaintiff.

The Plaintiff also asked the courtroom to get Defendant I and Defendant II not to withdraw the Plaintiff’s bank warranty just before a definite reduction benefit was acquired from the effects of the investigative audit.

In the most important scenario, the plaintiff questioned the court, to start with to accept and grant the plaintiff’s assert in its entirety. 2nd, stating that the declare for payment submitted by the defendant to the plaintiff is invalid and has no binding legal drive for the reason that it is altering, unsure and not supported by valid lawful evidence.

3rd, stating the actions or steps of the Defendant who disbursed the Plaintiff’s Financial institution Assurance to Co-Defendant I with Quantity 252/GB/JKJ.1/IV/2018 Serial Quantity GB029373 dated 24 April 2018 on 17 Oct 2018 as an unlawful act.

Fourth, declared null and void the disbursement of the Plaintiff’s Bank Assure which was proposed by the defendant to co-defendant I.

Examine also: Sacrificing 97 flight routes to close in 2022, Garuda Indonesia chooses to rely on….

Fifth, punishing the Defendant to deliver compensation to the plaintiff with the pursuing information:

  • Material Losses of Rp. 2,962,553,000,- (two billion 9 hundred sixty two million five hundred fifty three thousand rupiah),
  • Immaterial losses of Rp. 1,500,000,000, – (a person billion 5 hundred million), as of this decision has lasting legal drive.

View Article Sources on Viva Disclaimer: This short article is a collaboration between Warta Ekonomi and Viva. Issues associated to creating, shots, graphics, films, and the complete written content of the post are the responsibility of Viva.